Re. Kirschner et al., Cleft-palate repair by modified Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experience, PLAS R SURG, 104(7), 1999, pp. 1998-2010
Although the optimal technique of cleft-palate repair remains controversial
, several small series have suggested that superior speech results may be o
btained with the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty. To examine speech outcome
in a large series of Furlow palatoplasties performed at a single center, w
e retrospectively reviewed the records of 390 cleft-palate patients who und
erwent Furlow palatoplasty at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from
1979 to 1992. Speech outcome at 5 years of age or greater was available for
181 nonsyndromic patients and was scored using the Pittsburgh Weighted Val
ues for Speech Symptoms Associated with Velopharyngeal Incompetence. No or
mild hypernasality was noted in 93.4 percent of patients, with 88.4 percent
demonstrating no or inaudible nasal escape and 97.2 percent demonstrating
no errors in articulation associated with velopharyngeal incompetence. Seco
ndary pharyngeal flap surgery was required in just 7.2 percent of patients.
Age at palatoplasty, cleft type, and experience of the operating surgeon h
ad no significant effect on speech results, although there was a trend towa
rd better outcome in those undergoing palatal repair before 6 months of age
and toward poorer outcome in those with Veau class I and II clefts. Overal
l, Furlow palatoplasty yielded outstanding speech results, with rates of ve
lopharyngeal dysfunction that seem to improve upon those reported for other
techniques.