Mr. Lepper et al., Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation - Uses and abuses of meta-analysis: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999), PSYCHOL B, 125(6), 1999, pp. 669-676
Recently, 3 different meta-analytic reviews of the literature concerning th
e effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation have appeared, inclu
ding that by Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999) in this issue. Interestingly,
despite their common focus, these reviews have offered dramatically opposed
bottom-line conclusions about the meaning and implications of this literat
ure. In this comment, the authors examine differences among these 3 reviews
and conclude that the findings of this literature have been more accuratel
y captured by the reviews of Deci et al. and Tang and Hall (1995) than by t
hat of Cameron and Pierce (1994). More broadly, the authors also suggest th
at there may be significant short- and long-term costs to the unthinking or
automatic use of meta-analysis with theoretically derived, procedurally di
verse, and empirically complex literatures like that concerning extrinsic r
ewards and intrinsic motivation.