T. Rutledge et al., Psychological risk factors may moderate pharmacological treatment effects among ischemic heart disease patients, PSYCHOS MED, 61(6), 1999, pp. 834-841
Background: Numerous research findings support the proposed connection betw
een such psychological characteristics as stress and hostility and the mani
festation of disease. However, less evidence is available concerning the ro
le(s) psychological factors might play in the process of disease recovery.
Methods: Eighty patients with known coronary disease and exercise-induced i
schemia underwent treadmill exercise testing and 48-hour ambulatory electro
cardiographic monitoring and completed a battery of standardized psychologi
cal tests assessing hostility, depression, and daily stress on four occasio
ns during a 12-week pharmacological treatment study. After withdrawal of an
tiischemic drugs at baseline, patients returned for subsequent tests at 3-w
eek intervals. During the second and third intervals, patients were prescri
bed one of two antiischemic medications. atenolol or amlodipine, or given a
placebo. All patients were then placed on a combination treatment protocol
for the 3 weeks before the final testing date. Results: The combination tr
eatment produced highly significant benefits across all measured cardiac va
riables (20.3% improvement in exercise performance, 13% reduction in report
ed angina, 64.0% reduction in the frequency of: ischemic episodes; for all,
p < .01). However, results showed that high baseline levels of daily stres
s were associated with reliably smaller treatment effects;ls on measures of
ischemia frequency and treadmill exorcise time and with a significantly gr
eater likelihood of reporting angina after treatment (r = -0.24, -0.25, and
-0.33, respectively; p < .05). In addition, high baseline hostility predic
ted significantly smaller diastolic blood pressure improvements (r = -0.29,
p < .05). Conclusions: These results indicate that psychological risk fact
ors may have globally negative effects on the course of treatment and sugge
st particular factors that may warrant attention in trials targeting cardia
c symptom reduction.