PURPOSE: To determine the effect of reducing the number of sources per impl
antation on the dose coverage of the prostate volume.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Idealized source distributions were planned for four
, eight, 16, 24, 32, and 48 sources. The peripheral loading technique was u
sed to plan a uniform, conformal dose distribution to the target volume, wh
ich was the prostate volume as visualized at ultrasonography. Source-placem
ent error was estimated by using measured error magnitudes and was expresse
d with systematic and random components. The relative sensitivities of the
plans to the source-placement error were studied.
RESULTS: Idealized planned target coverage can be adequately achieved with
comparable dose distributions with eight or more sources. The sensitivity t
o source-placement error is comparable for plans with 16 or more sources.
CONCLUSION: It is theoretically possible to radically simplify implantation
without compromising target coverage or error tolerance.