We consider the appropriateness of institutionalizing soil quality as a def
ined parameter in soil science. The soil management research of land grant
universities and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the mission an
d goals of state, federal, and private conservation agencies stand to be si
gnificantly affected. We feel that a non-advocative examination of this con
cept could provide a positive contribution. The definition of soil quality
has proven elusive and value laden. There is concern by some that the conce
pt has developed arbitrary policy overtones. Our reservations stem from con
cerns regarding premature acceptance and institutionalization of an incompl
etely formulated and largely untested paradigm, potential unintended negati
ve outcomes, promotion of a narrowly defined environmental policy in a cont
ext normally associated with value-neutral science, and taxonomic and/or re
gional bias in establishing the paradigm, To date, soil quality assessments
have drawn from a relatively narrow crop production and ecological perspec
tive to positively or negatively weight soil quality assessment factors, Al
though the soil quality paradigm acknowledges multi-defined soil functions,
it has yet to operationally recognize and integrate the simultaneity of di
verse and often conflicting functions and soil property requirements. Thus,
we are attempting to articulate the concerns of many of our colleagues who
are reluctant to endorse redefining :the soil science paradigm away from t
he value-neutral tradition of edaphology and specific problem solving to a
paradigm based on variable, and often subjective societal perceptions of en
vironmental holism, Traditionally, it has been the soil science profession'
s role to perform the science to enable resource management policy and prob
lem solving, not to establish relational-based value systems within the sci
ence. We suggest emphasizing quality soil management rather than soil quali
ty management as a professional and scientific goal.