Solute leaching on the field-scale is a poorly understood, complex process
affected by local soil variation and landscape position. We hypothesized th
at Br ion leaching is a function of landscape position in a well-structured
, clayey soil on a Piedmont toposequence that had been in pasture for the p
revious 30 yr, Dry KBr, mixed with sand at a ratio of 12 g sand to 1 g KBr,
was surface-applied at a rate of 314 kg Br ha(-1) on 24 May 1994 along two
transects and allowed to move into the-soil under natural rainfall conditi
ons. Soil cores 0.90- and 2.00-m-long were taken 13 June and 20 Dec. 1994,
respectively (corresponding to 20 and 210 d after Pr application and 15 and
63 cm rain, respectively). The cores were subdivided into increments 10 or
15 cm, oven dried, and analyzed for Pr, Centers of Br mass at both samplin
g times were significantly deeper in the footslope position (31 and 82 cm f
or June and December, respectively) compared with the shoulder and linear s
lope positions combined (25 and 70 cm for June and December, respectively),
which was possibly due to lower clay contents (44 vs. 50% clay) and lower
water retention (37 vs. 43 cm in the:top meter in December) for the footslo
pe vs. the linear and shoulder slopes combined, respectively. Predicted lea
ching depths were calculated from measured soil water content profiles and
were positively correlated with observed depths to the center of Pr mass fo
r the Dec. 20 sampling (r(2) = 0.35, P < 0.007). Anion leaching may be part
ially controlled by landscape position, and soils susceptible to initial ra
pid leaching may not necessarily be susceptible to sustained rapid leaching
throughout the year.