Gd. Macfarlane et al., Analysis of whole blood tacrolimus concentrations in liver transplant patients exhibiting impaired liver function, THER DRUG M, 21(6), 1999, pp. 585-592
In transplant patients with impaired Liver function, HPLC methodologies hav
e been suggested for monitoring whole blood tacrolimus concentrations becau
se of the reported inaccuracy of immunoassay for whole blood tacrolimus con
centrations. One hundred fifty whole blood samples from 50 subjects enrolle
d in a multicenter liver transplant trial were chosen for HPLC/MS/MS analys
is without consideration of the clinical status of the patient at the time
of sampling. These samples were chosen to represent the sampling intervals
during the 12-week posttransplantation period. Retrospectively, the authors
identified a subset of 39 samples from 27 subjects exhibiting impaired liv
er function as demonstrated by bilirubin concentrations > 3.0 mg/dL (mean /- SD = 7.5 +/- 5.6 mg/dL), The authors compared the agreement of concentra
tions obtained from the PRO-Trac II ELISA and HPLC/MS/MS by least squares l
inear regression analysis and Bland/Altman analysis, in this subset against
the agreement of concentrations for 76 samples with normal bilirubin. In t
he samples obtained from patients with impaired liver function the resultin
g regression equation was: ELISA = 1.19(HPLC) + 0.7; r = 0.9. The mean diff
erence (HPLC/MS/MS - ELISA) was -2.5 ng/mL +/- 2.9 ng/mL (mean +/- SD). Whi
le 71% of samples agreed within 3 ng/mL, 3% (n = 1) exhibited a difference
>10 ng/ml. The corresponding evaluation of the samples with normal bilirubi
n concentrations resulted in the regression equation ELISA = 0.96(HPLC) + 0
.9; r = 0.9, and a mean difference of -0.6 ng/mL +/- 2.3 ng/mL. The authors
conclude that while a small subset of patients with cholestasis may requir
e closer evaluation with a more specific methodology, the majority of the p
atients may be satisfactorily monitored with the PRO-Trac II ELISA.