Dj. Demczar et al., PHARMACOKINETICS OF GENTAMICIN AT TRADITIONAL VERSUS HIGH-DOSES - IMPLICATIONS FOR ONCE-DAILY AMINOGLYCOSIDE DOSING, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 41(5), 1997, pp. 1115-1119
Two doses of gentamicin (2 and 7 mg/kg of body weight) were administer
ed to 11 healthy volunteers in a randomized, crossover single-dose stu
dy to compare their pharmacokinetics. Doses were infused over 1 h with
a syringe infusion pump, and 14 concentrations in sera were obtained
over an 8-h period, Concentration in serum versus time data were fitte
d to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, In addition, to mimic th
e clinical setting, subjects' data were fitted by the Sawchuk-Zaske me
thod, Distributional and postdistributional peak concentrations, along
with the last obtained concentration in serum, were utilized to compa
re the following pharmacokinetic variables: volume of distribution at
steady state (V-ss), half-life, clearance (CL), and maximum concentrat
ion in serum (C-max), With two-compartment pharmacokinetic fitting, si
gnificant differences in distribution half-life (average, 21.8 and 41.
6 min [P less than or equal to 0.05]) and gentamicin CL (76.6 +/- 6.6
and 67.2 +/- 4.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [P less than or equal to 0.001]) wer
e found between traditional-dose and high-dose groups, respectively, W
hen the data for concentrations in sera were fitted to a one-compartme
nt pharmacokinetic model by using either the distributional or the pos
tdistributional C-max, statistically significant differences (P less t
han or equal to 0.001) were found between V-ss, half-life, CL, and C-m
ax values for both dosage groups, The results show that the pharmacoki
netics of gentamicin at a large dose differ significantly from those a
t the traditional dose, This information has direct implications for o
nce-daily aminoglycoside (ODA) literature when the C-max values report
ed are distributional and therefore show falsely high C-max/MIC ratio
estimates, In addition, ODA nomogram dosing tools developed with distr
ibutional C-max values are probably inaccurate.