Cm. O'Connor et al., A randomized trial of ecadotril versus placebo in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: The US Ecadotril Pilot Safety Study, AM HEART J, 138(6), 1999, pp. 1140-1148
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective To determine the short-term safety and tolerability of the additi
on of ecadotril to conventional therapy in patients with mild to moderate h
eart failure.
Methods Fifty ambulatory patients, 18 to 75 years of age, with mild to mode
rate heart failure, left ventricular election fraction less than or equal t
o 35%, taking stable doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, diur
etics, and optionally digoxin were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled dose-escalation study of ecadotril 50 to 400 mg twice da
ily versus conventional therapy alone.
Results No increases in deaths, serious adverse events, or dropouts from ad
verse events were observed for the ecadotril group compared with placebo. T
he serum measures of neurohormonal activation were highly variable. Changes
in signs and symptoms of heart failure, New York Heart Association class,
and patient self-assessment of symptoms were not observed with ecadotril th
erapy; however, the study was not designed to detect differences in these p
arameters.
Conclusion In this small pilot study, ecadotril in doses of 50 to 400 mg tw
ice daily was generally well-tolerated and without severe short-term advers
e effects in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Evaluation of th
e clinical efficacy and long-term safety of ecadotril and other neutral end
opeptidase inhibitors in patients with heart Failure requires further study
.