The supply of radiation therapists has increased, whereas reimbursements ha
ve decreased. One hypothesis is that if we choose to employ as permanent st
aff sufficient therapists to handle the low-volume periods and scheduled te
mporary staff as the demand for radiation therapy services warrants, we wou
ld increase efficiency. Using current economic assumptions and the treatmen
ts delivered during the past 12 months, we analyzed the labor expense and r
evenue consequences of both full staffing and a lower level of staffing wit
h per diem supplementation based on the scheduled patient load. We then cor
related the scheduled treatments with the actual treatments delivered and f
inally, reexamined both the full-staffing model and the per diem supplement
ation model based on the predictions of our scheduling model. The reduction
in full-time therapists and per diem supplementation did not produce subst
antial incremental revenue, However, examining the relationship between pat
ients scheduled for treatment on the next day and patients actually treated
, revealed an 11% "no show" rate with a 95% confidence interval of 1%. Our
new, experienced-based model demonstrated considerable revenues to be reali
zed by using the no-show factor to better use therapists by more aggressive
scheduling of outpatients, therapists, and more flexible transportation of
inpatients. We conclude that the experience-based model predicts the margi
nal revenue, but is silent on the quality of the medical care provided.