G. Swart et al., Acute myocardial infarction complicated by hemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmia: Prehospital and ED treatment with atropine, AM J EMER M, 17(7), 1999, pp. 647-652
The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic response to at
ropine of patients experiencing hemodynamically compromising bradyarrhythmi
a related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the prehospital(PH) setti
ng and the therapeutic impact of the PH response to atropine on further Eme
rgency Department (ED) care. In addition, the prevalence of AMI in patients
presenting with atrioventricular block (AVB) is noted. Retrospective revie
w of PH, emergency department (ED), and hospital records. PH patients, with
hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or AVE with evidence of spontaneo
us circulation, who received atropine as delivered by emergency medical ser
vices (EMS) personnel, were used. Urban/suburban fire department-based emer
gency medical services (EMS) system with on-line medical control serving a
population of approximately 1.6 million persons. Hemodynamic instability wa
s defined as the presence of any of the following: ischemic chest pain, dys
pnea, syncope, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure less than
90 mm Hg. Bradycardia was defined as sinus bradycardia, junctional bradyca
rdia, or idioventricular bradycardia (grouped as bradycardia), whereas AVE
included first-, second (types I and Il), or third-degree (grouped as AVE).
The response that occurred within 1 minute of atropine dosing was recorded
as none, partial, complete, or adverse. Comparisons were made between pati
ents with AMI and non-AMI hospital discharge diagnoses. The diagnosis of AM
I was confirmed by abnormal elevations in creatinine phosphokinase MB fract
ion. One hundred seventy-two patients meeting entry criteria were identifie
d. Of these, 131 (76.1%) had complete PH, ED, and hospital records and were
used for data analysis. Forty-five patients (34.3%) had a primary hospital
discharge diagnosis of AMI; the remaining patients had a non-AMI discharge
diagnosis. AMI patients were significantly younger (67 +/- 12 V 73 +/- 13
years, P =.025), were less likely to have a history of heart disease (35.5%
v54.7%, P =.038), and were more likely to present with chest pain (68.9% v
24.4%, P <.001) or hypotension (60% v37.2%, P =.013) compared with non-AMI
patients. Forty-five of 131 patients presented with AVE, of which 25 had a
hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI (55.6%). The mean time from first dose
of atropine to ED arrival and the total dose of atropine received in the PH
setting did not differ between AMI and non-AMI groups (15.2 +/- 7.7 v 16.2
+/- 8.7 minutes, P =.5; and 0.9 +/- 0.49 v 1.0 +/- 0.58 mg, P=.25). The li
kelihood of achieving normal sinus rhythm in the PH setting did not differ
between AMI and non AMI groups (40% v 18.6%, P =.07). Ho differences were f
ound between AMI and non AMI groups in the amount of additional atropine gi
ven (1.2 +/- 0.58 v 1.3 +/- 1.1 mg, P=.58) or the use of other resuscitativ
e therapies after ED arrival (isoproterenol, 13.3% v12.8%, P =.93; dopamine
, 28.9% v26.7% P =.79; transcutaneous pacing, 26.7% v 26.7%, P=.99; transve
nous pacing, 8.9% v5.8%, P =.51), with the exception of thrombolytic therap
y (24.4% v 0%, P<.001) and cardiac catheterization (22.2% v 3.4%, P=.001).
Despite a tack of significant difference in achieving a normal sinus rhythm
in the prehospital or ED setting, AMI patients were more likely to achieve
a normal sinus rhythm over the total course of PH and ED care than non-AMI
patients (44.4% v 24.4%, P=.019). Hemodynamically unstable (by ACLS criter
ion) AVE presenting in the PH setting is associated with a hospital diagnos
is of AMI in most (55.6%) patients in this study.
AMI patients with hemodynamically unstable AVB or bradycardia are no more l
ikely to respond to atropine therapy in the PH setting than patients with n
on-AMI hospital diagnoses. Finally, although there is no difference in the
treatment of compromising AVE or bradycardia received by AMI versus non-AMI
patients in the PH or ED setting, AMI patients are more likely to achieve
a normal sinus rhythm over the total course of care than non AMI patients.(
Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:647 652. Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company
).