A comparison of levobupivacaine 0.125%, fentanyl 4 mu g/mL, or their combination for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major orthopedic surgery
Dj. Kopacz et al., A comparison of levobupivacaine 0.125%, fentanyl 4 mu g/mL, or their combination for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major orthopedic surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 89(6), 1999, pp. 1497-1503
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Levobupivacaine, the isolated S(-) isomer of bupivacaine, is less cardiotox
ic than racemic bupivacaine in animal studies. We studied the effectiveness
of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with either levobupivacain
e 0.125% or fentanyl 4 mu g/mL alone, or a combination of levobupivacaine a
nd fentanyl in 65 patients after total joint arthroplasty in a prospective,
random, double-blinded fashion. Intraoperatively, all patients received 20
mt of 0.75% levobupivacaine. Study medication was infused at an initial ra
te of 4 mL/h, with additional medication available on patient demand (2 mL/
10 min). The combination of levobupivacaine and fentanyl produced better an
algesia (longer time to first PCEA request; P = 0.007 combination versus fe
ntanyl and P = 0.006 combination versus levobupivacaine) than either drug a
lone. Patients in the levobupivacaine groups had appreciable sensory blocka
de to pinprick with minimal motor impairment. Resting and dynamic visual an
alog scale pain scores were lower in the combination group than in the plai
n fentanyl group at 6 (P = 0.022 and 0.036) and 12 h (P = 0.002 and 0.001).
The 24-h overall patient- and investigator-rated visual analog scale pain
scores were also lower in the combination group (resting P = 0.007, dynamic
P = 0.005). There was no significant difference among the groups in the in
cidence of postoperative nausea (26.2%), pruritus (9.2%), hypotension (23.1
%), or sedation (0%). We conclude that the analgesic effects of levobupivac
aine 0.125% and fentanyl (4 mu g/mL) are additive and beneficial for the ma
nagement of orthopedic surgical pain by the PCEA method. Patients in this s
tudy began demand-dosing later, reported lower pain scores, and had no grea
ter risk of adverse events than those who were given either levobupivacaine
or fentanyl alone. Implications: We demonstrated a significant additive ef
fect of the combination of levobupivacaine (0.125%) and fentanyl (4 mu g/mL
), compared with either drug alone, when using patient-controlled epidural
analgesia in patients after total joint arthroplasty.