A recently described computer image analysis method was modified for quanti
fication of leaf area. These areas were compared to those estimated by a lo
wer resolution method based on planimetry. Leaves of Eucalyptus nitens (Dea
ne & Maiden) Maiden, pinnae of Dicksonia antarctica Labill. and leaves of A
cacia dealbata Link were used for analysis, offering surfaces of low, inter
mediate and high complexity, respectively. Low-resolution planimetry was fo
und to be a suitable method for the calculation of leaf area of simple broa
dleaves. However, for surfaces of greater complexity, the higher resolution
of image analysis gave more accurate estimates of area. Overlapping of pri
mary pinnae in the complex A. dealbata leaf proved to be a larger source of
error than inadequacy of resolution.