Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques

Citation
Vlh. Hoffmann et al., Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques, BR J ANAEST, 83(5), 1999, pp. 807-809
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00070912 → ACNP
Volume
83
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
807 - 809
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(199911)83:5<807:PESDSO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
We have compared skin to epidural space distance (SED) and tip to tip dista nce (TTD), a measure of posterior epidural space depth (PESD), in 40 patien ts with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle after identification of the epidural spa ce using the hanging drop (HD) or loss of resistance (LOR) to air technique . After the LOR technique, TTD was found to be 2 mm greater than that after the HD technique, whereas SED was the same. We conclude that identificatio n of the epidural space can be performed successfully with both techniques, but with a diminished risk of dural damage after LOR compared with the HD technique.