Bch. Tsui et al., Thoracic epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using nerve stimulation in an infant with CATCH22, CAN J ANAES, 46(12), 1999, pp. 1138-1142
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
Purpose: To illustrate insertion of an epidural catheter via caudal route i
n a small infant under electrical stimulation guidance.
Clinical features: A six month old boy, weighting 4.25 kg, with a diagnosis
of CATCH22 (Cardiac abnormality/abnormal faces, T cell deficit due to thym
ic hypoplasia, cleft palate, hypocalcemia due to hypoparathyroidism resulti
ng from 22q11 deletion) was scheduled for fundoplication and gastrostomy tu
be (G-tube) insertion. A combined light general anesthesia and continuous e
pidural anesthesia technique was selected. Following induction of general a
nesthesia and tracheal intubation with 1.5 mg midazolam, 10 mu g fentanyl a
nd 10 mg succinylcholine, a 16G intravenous catheter was inserted into the
caudal space, A 19G epidural catheter (Arrow Flextip Plus) epidural cathete
r was then inserted up cranially. A low electrical current(1 - 10mA) was th
en applied through the catheter. The level of motor movement was advanced f
rom the lower limb muscles to the upper abdominal muscles as the catheter w
as threaded cranially. After 19 cm of epidural catheter had been inserted,
intercostal muscle movement (T9-10 level) was observed at 4.2mA. The tip of
the catheter was later confirmed to be at the T9-10 interspace by radiogra
phical imaging. The patient awakened without distress and the trachea was e
xtubated the same evening. The infant was discharged to the ward next morni
ng with good pain relief from a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacane
0.1% with 1 mu g.ml(-1) at 1.6 ml(-1).
Conclusion: Epidural stimulation may help placement of the epidural cathete
r at the appropriate dermatome For effective anesthesia and analgesia.