OBJECTIVE: TO describe a method of reducing the costs of implants in hip an
d knee arthroplasty.
DESIGN: Implant costs were compared before and after the implementation of
a 2-year contract with implant vendors, providing increased volume for decr
eased implant cost. An additional 20% of arthroplasties could be done outsi
de the contract for research or special purposes.
SETTING: A regional health authority involving 2 acute cafe hospitals.
METHOD: Costs were obtained for 942 hip and knee arthroplasties performed i
n 1993/94 and compared with costs of 1656 hip and knee arthroplasties perfo
rmed in 1996/97,
OUTCOME MEASURES: Implant cost and number of joint arthroplasty procedures
performed.
RESULTS: A 40% decrease in the cost per implant for primary knee arthroplas
ty and an 18% decrease in the cost per implant for primary hip arthroplasty
were achieved; A rebate, calculated as a percentage of volume used, was re
ceived from the vendor to support general orthopedic research and education
. A new contract for 3 years has recently been signed with 3 vendors design
ated as primary vendors for 80% of the volume.
CONCLUSION: The vendor-contract economic strategy effectively reduced the c
ost of hip and knee arthroplasty and may be useful at other centres looking
for cost reduction methods that maintain adequate patient care and support
clinical research and education.