Biodiversity conservation has become the stated objective of national gover
nments, state agencies, local communities, and scientific organizations Yet
despite this attention tbe term biodiversity remains poorly defined. One o
f the unfortunate consequences of this lack of definition is a proliferatio
n of claims that biodiversity can De both used and conserved. This claim is
difficult to assess without a more precise way of defining biodiversity. W
e offer a heuristic framework for measuring the consequences of human use f
or biodiversity. Our definition of biodiversity includes three components:
genetic, population/species, and community/ecosystem. Each component has it
s own three attributes: composition, structure, and function. Using this de
finition, we assessed the effects of different types of human use on the di
fferent components and attributes of biodiversity. We shore that (I) differ
ent degrees of human use or alteration result in differential conservation
of biodiversity components; (2) some components non attributes of biodivers
ity are more sensitive to human use than others; and (3) only extremely lim
ited use or virtually no alteration will protect ail components.