We assessed the degree to which Alaskan lands reflect the state's biodivers
ity by dividing the entire state into four categories of land protection ra
nging from highly protected to minimally protected in terms of potential fo
r future development. We then compared the percentage of each ecoregion and
plant-cover type in each land protection class. We assumed that 12% protec
tion represents an acceptable minimum and examined the percentage of site r
ecords of rare plants in protected and unprotected areas. Of 28 ecoregions
in Alaska, 15 (63.4%) have <12% of their area in highly protected areas. Si
milarly, 11 of 21 vegetation-cover types (43.7%) have <12% protection. For
32 rare vascular plants, an average of 27% of records occur on highly prote
cted lands. Seventy-five percent of the rare plants had <50% of their recor
ds from highly protected lands. Less than 1% of Alaska has been permanently
altered by human activity. In contrast to the lower 48 states, times remai
ns to plan development that preserves biodiversity while permitting an econ
omically sustainable economy-if the effort is made now.