We examined several strategies to reduce seabird bycatch, primarily of Comm
on Murres (Uria aalge) and Rhinoceros Auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata), in a
coastal salmon drift gillnet fishery in Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A. Ou
r goal was to significantly reduce seabird bycatch without a concomitant re
duction in target catch or an increase in the bycatch of any other species.
We compared fish catch and seabird bycatch in nets modified to include vis
ual alerts (highly visible netting in the upper net) or acoustic alerts (pi
ngers) to traditional monofilament nets set throughout the normal fishing h
ours over a 5-week fishing season. Catch and bycatch varied significantly a
s a function of gear. Relative to monofilament controls, murres responded t
o both visual and acoustic alerts; auklets and sockeye salmon responded to
deeper visual alerts only. Seabird abundance varied across multiple tempora
l scales: interannually, within fishing season, and over the day. At the in
ternational level, seabird entanglement was linked to regional abundance on
the fishing grounds, a pattern that broke down at local level. Within seas
on, sockeye and murre abundance were negatively correlated, suggesting that
if fishery openings were scheduled on peak abundance of the target species
, seabird bycatch would be significantly reduced as a function of increased
target fishing efficiency. Finally both sockeye catch and auklet entanglem
ent were highest at dawn, whereas murre entanglement was high at both dawn
and dusk. Our results identify three complementary tools to reduce seabird
bycatch in the Puget Sound drift gillnet fishery-gear modifications, abunda
nce-based fishery openings, and time-of-day restrictions-for a possible red
uction in seabird bycatch of up to 70-75% without a significant reduction i
n target get fishing efficiency. Although these tools are based on local co
nditions and will thus vary among years and locations, all night be exporta
ble to other coastal gillnet fisheries worldwide.