Several captive breeding regimes were compared for their ability to maintai
n fitness (larval viability) and genetic variation in small populations of
the housefly (Musca domestica L.). Populations were either maintained at co
nstant sizes of 40, 200, or 2000 individuals or initiated with two pairs of
flies and allowed to grow to 40 individuals (low-founder-number population
s). Low-founder-number populations without migration exhibited low larval v
iability (22%) after 24 generations, compared to larger populations maintai
ned at either 200 (49%) or 2000 (69%) individuals, and suffered high extinc
tion, with only 44% of the lines surviving 24 generations. Low-founder-numb
er populations subjected to two additional founder (bottleneck) episodes, r
educing them to two pairs of flies, suffered little additional loss in fitn
ess or extinction compared to the single-founder treatments. Migration as l
ow as one individual per generation (2.5% migration) significantly offset b
oth reduced fitness and rate of extinction. Conversely, fitness was not sig
nificantly increased for low-founder-number populations when founders were
selected from the top performing 20% of pairs under full-sib mating. Popula
tions maintained at 40 individuals were not sustainable, exhibiting low lar
val viability (35%) and a high extinction rate (40%) over 24 generations, s
imilar to the extinction rates for populations initiated with only four fou
nders. Although none of the populations maintained at 200 individuals went
extinct, their fitness was reduced by 20% compared to a large control popul
ation maintained at 2000 individuals. Electrophoretic variation was signifi
cantly correlated with fitness across treatments, but the correlation of fi
tness to narrow-sense heritability of two morphometric trails was not signi
ficant.