The educational psychology literature is replete with references to higher-
order cognitive constructs, such as critical thinking and creativity. Presu
mably, these constructs represent the primary processes and outcomes that e
ducators should promote in students. For these constructs to be maximally u
seful, they must be transformed into specific operational definitions that
lead to reliable and valid assessment strategies. Minimizing overlap in the
definitions and assessment of different concepts would contribute to an or
derly accumulation of knowledge about the constructs in question. The ideal
would be for each construct to have a definition that is distinct from the
definitions of other cognitive constructs. Although higher-order cognitive
constructs have much surface appeal, their utility is tied to the clarity
and fidelity of their definitions and assessment procedures.