Estroprogestin vs. gonadotrophin agonists plus estroprogestin in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain: a randomized trial

Citation
F. Parazzini et al., Estroprogestin vs. gonadotrophin agonists plus estroprogestin in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain: a randomized trial, EUR J OB GY, 88(1), 2000, pp. 11-14
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03012115 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
11 - 14
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-2115(200001)88:1<11:EVGAPE>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objective: This is a randomized clinical trial comparing estroprogestin (E/ P) pill given for 12 months vs. gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GN RHa) given for 4 months followed by E/P pill treatment for 8 months in the relief of endometriosis-related pelvic pain. Methods: Eligible for the stud y were women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and pelvic pain lasting 3-12 months after diagnosis. Eligible women were randomly assigned to treatment with E/P pill (gestroden 0.75 mg and ethynlestradiol 0.03 mg) for 12 months (47 patients) vs. tryptorelin 3.75 mg slow release every 28 d ays for 4 months followed by E/P pill for 8 months (55 patients). Results: Al baseline, dysmenorrhea was reported in 46 women allocated to E/P pill on ly (97.9%), and in all the 55 women allocated to GNRHa+E/P pill. The corres ponding value at the 12 months follow-up visit was 14 subjects (35.9%) and 16 subjects (34.8%). The baseline median values of the multidimensional and analog scale were for dysmenorrhea 4 and 6 in the EP only and 3 and 6 in t he GNRHa+E/P group. The corresponding value at the 12 months follow-up visi t were 2 and 6 and 0 and 5, Non-menstrual pain was reported, respectively, at baseline and 12 month visit by 46 (97.9%) and 15 (38.5%) subjects in the E/P pill group and 49 (89.1%) and 17 (37.0%) of the GNRHa+E/P pill one. Th e baseline median values of the multidimensional and analog scale were for non-menstrual pain 3 and 5 in the E/P only and 2 and 6 in the GNRHa+E/P gro up. The corresponding values at the 12 month follow-up visit were 0 and 4 a nd 0 and 3. These differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: 1 year after randomization, the two treatment sc hedules show similar relief of pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.