Current value of double-contrast pharyngography and of computed tomographyfor the detection and for staging of hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and supraglottic tumors
M. Keberle et al., Current value of double-contrast pharyngography and of computed tomographyfor the detection and for staging of hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and supraglottic tumors, EUR RADIOL, 9(9), 1999, pp. 1843-1850
In light of recent endoscopic techniques the current value of double-contra
st pharynography (DCP) and of CT for detection and staging of hyporopharyng
eal, and supraglottic tumors is evaluated. The DCP of 151 patients and CT o
btained from 99 of these patients were retrospectively analyzed in a double
-blinded manner. We used a standard protocol which comprised all relevant a
natomical subregions. Results were compared with direct microlaryngoscopy (
DL), indirect laryngoscopy (IL), and post-operative histopathological findi
ngs. Sensitivity and specificity of DCP was 75.0% and 86.7%, respectively.
The DCP and IL techniques together yielded a higher sensitivity (96.7%) tha
n each method separately. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 87.5 and 10
0%, respectively. In 74.7% CT provided correct staging. Subregional analysi
s revealed that the results of DCP and CT depend highly on the localization
of the tumor. Our results indicate that DCP represents an important screen
ing method for diagnosing hypo-oropharyngeal, and supraglottic tumors to co
mplete IL and DL. We show that CT is a reliable method for preoperative sta
ging, although small superficial tumors may occasionally be missed by this
method.