Multiple inhalers confuse asthma patients

Citation
J. Van Der Palen et al., Multiple inhalers confuse asthma patients, EUR RESP J, 14(5), 1999, pp. 1034-1037
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09031936 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1034 - 1037
Database
ISI
SICI code
0903-1936(199911)14:5<1034:MICAP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of the use of different types of inha lers on the adequacy of inhalation technique among adult asthmatics. Three hypotheses were tested: first, patients using only one type of inhaler will demonstrate adequate inhalation technique more often than those with two o r more types, Secondly, patients using a combination of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) will demonstrate correct inhalation technique more often than those using the combination of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and a DPI. Thirdly, some inhalers or combinations of inhalers are more prone to erroneous inhal ation technique than others. Adult outpatients with asthma who regularly used inhaled steroid therapy (n =321) participated in the study. The inhalers investigated were MDIs on the one hand, and the DPIs Turbuhaler(R), Diskhaler(R), Cyclohaler(R), Inhaler Ingelheim(R) and Rotahaler(R) on the other. Of 208 adult asthmatics with only one inhaler, 71% made no inhalation error s versus 61% of 113 patients with two or more different inhalers. Of patien ts with a combination of DPIs 68% performed all essential checklist items c orrectly, versus 54% of patients,vith the combination of "regular" MDI and DPI. Patients using only the Diskhaler(R) made fewest errors. Whenever possible, only one type of inhaler should be prescribed. If a comb ination is unavoidable, combinations of DPIs are preferable to MDI and DPI. The Diskhaler seems to be the most foolproof device.