Kwt. Tsang et al., A comparative study on the efficacy of levofloxacin and ceftazidime in acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis, EUR RESP J, 14(5), 1999, pp. 1206-1209
A prospective randomized study was performed in order to compare the effica
cy of oral levofloxacin, a new S- isomer of ofloxacin, with intravenous cef
tazidime in the empirical treatment of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasi
s.
Consecutive patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis were recruit
ed at a tertiary referral centre and were randomized to receive 10 days' tr
eatment with either oral levofloxacin (300 mg b.i.d.) or ceftazidime (1 g i
.v. t.i.d.). Body temperature, cough score, dyspnoea score, sputum purulenc
e and volume and white blood cell and neutrophil count were assessed on day
1 and day 10.
Thirty-five patients (mean age 61 yrs, 15 males) completed the study; 17 of
these were in the levofloxacin group. There was no significant difference
in the distribution of sputum pathogens or clinical parameters between the
two groups at entry to and completion of the study. Both groups of patients
showed significant improvement in 24-h sputum volume, sputum purulence sco
re, cough score and dyspnoea score (p<0.001) but there was no significant d
ifference between these two groups at entry to or on completion of the stud
y (p>0.05).
The results of this study suggest that oral administration of levofloxacin
is as effective as parenteral ceftazidime in the empirical treatment of exa
cerbations in bronchiectasis.