A comparative study on the efficacy of levofloxacin and ceftazidime in acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis

Citation
Kwt. Tsang et al., A comparative study on the efficacy of levofloxacin and ceftazidime in acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis, EUR RESP J, 14(5), 1999, pp. 1206-1209
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09031936 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1206 - 1209
Database
ISI
SICI code
0903-1936(199911)14:5<1206:ACSOTE>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
A prospective randomized study was performed in order to compare the effica cy of oral levofloxacin, a new S- isomer of ofloxacin, with intravenous cef tazidime in the empirical treatment of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasi s. Consecutive patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis were recruit ed at a tertiary referral centre and were randomized to receive 10 days' tr eatment with either oral levofloxacin (300 mg b.i.d.) or ceftazidime (1 g i .v. t.i.d.). Body temperature, cough score, dyspnoea score, sputum purulenc e and volume and white blood cell and neutrophil count were assessed on day 1 and day 10. Thirty-five patients (mean age 61 yrs, 15 males) completed the study; 17 of these were in the levofloxacin group. There was no significant difference in the distribution of sputum pathogens or clinical parameters between the two groups at entry to and completion of the study. Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in 24-h sputum volume, sputum purulence sco re, cough score and dyspnoea score (p<0.001) but there was no significant d ifference between these two groups at entry to or on completion of the stud y (p>0.05). The results of this study suggest that oral administration of levofloxacin is as effective as parenteral ceftazidime in the empirical treatment of exa cerbations in bronchiectasis.