Results of a standardized survey on the medical use of cannabis products in the German-speaking area

Citation
M. Schnelle et al., Results of a standardized survey on the medical use of cannabis products in the German-speaking area, FORSCH KOMP, 6, 1999, pp. 28-36
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN
ISSN journal
10217096 → ACNP
Volume
6
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
3
Pages
28 - 36
Database
ISI
SICI code
1021-7096(199910)6:<28:ROASSO>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The plant Cannabis sativa has a long history of medical use in the treatmen t of pain and spasms, the promotion of sleep, and the suppression of nausea and vomiting. However, in the early 70s cannabis was classified in the Nar cotic Acts in countries all over the world as having no therapeutic benefit ; therefore, it cannot be prescribed by physicians or dispensed by pharmaci sts. In the light of this contradictory situation an increasing number of p atients practices a self-prescription with cannabis products for relieving a variety of symptoms. An anonymous standardized survey of the medical use of cannabis and cannabis products of patients in Germany, Austria and Switz erland was conducted by the Association for Cannabis as Medicine (Cologne, Germany). During about one year 170 subjects participated in this survey; q uestionnaires of 128 patients could be included into the evaluation. 68% of these participants were males, 32% females, with a total mean age of 37.5 (+/-19.6) years. The most frequently mentioned indications for medicinal ca nnabis use were depression (12.0%), multiple sclerosis (10.8%), HIV-infecti on (9.0%), migraine (6.6%), asthma (6.0%), back pain (5.4%), hepatitis C (4 .8%), sleeping disorders (4.8%), epilepsy (3.6%), spasticity (3.6%), headac he (3.6%), alcoholism (3.0%), glaucoma (3.0%), nausea (3.0%), disk prolapse (2.4%), and spinal cord injury (2,4%). The majority of patients used natur al cannabis products such as marihuana, hashish and an alcoholic tincture; in just 5 cases dronabinol (Marinol(R)) was taken by prescription. About ha lf of the 128 participants of the survey (52.4%) had used cannabis as a rec reational drug before the onset of their illness. To date 14.3% took cannab is orally, 49.2% by inhalation and in 36.5% of cases both application modes were used. 72.2% of the patients stated the symptoms of their illness to h ave 'much improved' after cannabis ingestion, 23.4% stated to have 'slightl y improved', 4.8% experienced 'no change' and 1.6% described that their sym ptoms got 'worse: Being asked for the satisfaction with their therapeutic u se of cannabis 60.8% stated to be 'very satisfied: 24.0% 'satiesfied: 11.2% 'partly satisfied' and 4.0% were 'not satisfied: 70.8% experienced no side effects, 26.4% described 'moderate' and 3.3% 'strong' side effects. 84.1% of patients have not felt any need for dose escalation during the last 3 mo nths, 11.0% had to increase their cannabis dose 'moderately' and 4.8% 'stro ngly' in order to maintain the therapeutic effects. Thus, this survey demon strates a successful use of cannabis products for the treatment of a multit ude of Various illnesses and symptoms. This use was usually accompanied onl y by slight and in general acceptable side effects. Because the patient gro up responding to this survey is presumably highly selected, no conclusions can be drawn about the quantity of wanted and unwanted effects of the medic inal use of the hemp plant for particular indications.