Contact lenses can be worn in a variety of environmental conditions an
d do not increase the wearers risk of injury. In many situations they
offer significant corneal protection. Currently firefighters are prohi
bited from using contact lenses. To evaluate whether contact lenses ar
e a safe form of visual correction 50 firefighters were fitted, and ex
amined after 1, 4 and 10 months of contact lens wear. Twenty-nine were
fitted with soft contact lenses, and 21 with rigid gas permeable cont
act lenses. Statistically significant increase in lid sulcus hyperaemi
a was found in both the SCL and RGPCL groups (P < 0.01, P = 0.02, resp
ectively), as well as an increase in hyperaemia of the vertical quadra
nt of the bulbar conjunctivae (P = 0.01, P = 0.02, respectively). In a
ddition the RGPCL group showed a statistically significant increase in
hyperaemia of the lateral portion of the bulbar conjunctivae (P < 0.0
1), consistent with exposure epitheliopathy. The SCL group showed stat
istically significant increase in corneal staining in the vertical qua
drant for all visits (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, P = 0.02 for all visits, res
pectively), indicative of lens dehydration. These findings although cl
inically significant are not unique to firefighting, and are found wit
hin a ''normal'' population of contact lens wearers. In conjunction wi
th questionnaire data (Owen et ai., 1996) we conclude that soft contac
t lenses can be worn safely by firefighters without additional risk. (
C) 1997 The College of Optometrists.