Routine radiography following ankle fracture fixation: a case for limitingits use

Citation
S. Harish et al., Routine radiography following ankle fracture fixation: a case for limitingits use, INJURY, 30(10), 1999, pp. 699-701
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
ISSN journal
00201383 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
699 - 701
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-1383(199912)30:10<699:RRFAFF>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The use of fluoroscopic screening in the orthopaedic theatre is a necessary operative aid in many procedures. Modern systems give good image resolutio n and allow the production of per-operative hard-copy prints. This study wa s performed to compare these prints with postoperative radiographs in 41 pa tients who underwent internal fixation for an ankle fracture in a 6-month p eriod. The hard-copy prints and the postoperative X-ray films were independ ently assessed for several features, which included status of the tibiofibu lar syndesmosis, fibular length, talo-crural angle, talar tilt, presence an d size of a posterior malleolar fracture, and abnormality of the medial cle ar space. Information was also recorded as to whether there had been a chan ge in postoperative management plan after review of the check X-ray. Of the 41 cases, 30 were suitable for full assessment, In 25 of these cases there was no difference in the information provided by the hard-copy prints from fluoroscopic images and the postoperative check X-rays. In the other five cases, the differences were not significant. In none of the cases did the c heck X-ray effect a change in postoperative management. We therefore sugges t that if per-operative hard-copy prints are obtained from the fluoroscopic images, postoperative radiographs of the ankle are only necessary in excep tional circumstances. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.