Thousands of individuals in a house-hunting honey bee swarm make a collecti
ve: decision for one among many nest sites discovered. Mie recorded the dan
ces on swarms in a forested area, where one swarm's search encompassed abou
t 150 km(2) and many different sites. We then analyzed swarms in a desert a
rea with only nest sites that we provided and monitored, to study how the s
warm winnows multiple finds to a single site over the course of a few days,
Most bees did not visit any site, very few visited more than one. Apparent
ly choices were made with little or no direct comparison, through the inter
action of two mechanisms: positive feedback through recruitment leading to
growth in the number of scouts visiting good nest sites, and attrition redu
cing activity and recruitment for non-chosen sites. Individual differences
between bees substantially affected these dynamics. Scouts varied considera
bly in amount of dancing and persistence, but most that danced did so vigor
ously after their first few visits, and then dropped out, ceasing their dan
cing though continuing to visit the nest site. Dances were nearly twice as
long as reported for nectar and pollen. Scouts followed dances of others, a
nd occasionally visited alternative sites, but rarely switched their dancin
g. When unanimity is reached the bees must recognize that a decision has be
en made, break up the swarm cluster, and fly to the nest site. Buzz-running
(Schwirrlaufen) probably plays a role here, but we observed less buzz-runn
ing than previously reported, and this occurred even early in the process;
it might function as a chain-reaction effect triggering the end of the hous
e-hunting process. Our results suggest that the choice among nest sites rel
ies less on direct comparison of nest sites, and more on inherent processes
of positive feedback and attrition by dancers dropping out.