The use of different buffers during continuous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute renal failure

Citation
P. Heering et al., The use of different buffers during continuous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute renal failure, INTEN CAR M, 25(11), 1999, pp. 1244-1251
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1244 - 1251
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(199911)25:11<1244:TUODBD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective: To determine the impact of different hemofiltration (HF) replace ment fluids on the acid-base status and cardiovascular hemodynamics in pati ents with acute renal failure (ARF) and continuous veno-venous hemofiltrati on (CVVH). Design: Prospective, cohort study. Setting: Intensive Care Unit of the Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dus seldorf, Germany. Subject and methods: One hundred and thirty-two critically ill patients wit h acute renal failure and continuous veno-venous HF were studied. Fifty-two patients were subjected to lactate-based (group 1), and 32 to acetate-base d hemofiltration (group 2)while 48 (group 3) were treated with bicarbonate- based buffer hemofiltration fluid. Fifty-seven had a septic, and 75 a cardi ovascular, origin of the ARE Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum b icarbonate, arterial pH, lactate and Apache II scores were noted daily. Main results: The mean CVVH duration was 9.8 +/- 8.1 days, mortality was 65 %. No difference was present between the groups under investigation with re gard to the main clinical parameters. Lactate- and bicarbonate-based hemofi ltration led to significantly higher serum bicarbonate and arterial pH valu es as compared to the acetate-based hemofiltration. Serum bicarbonate value s at 48 h after the initiation of CVVH treatment were 25.7 +/- 3.8 mmol/l ( p < 0.001) in group 1, 20.6 +/- 3.1 mmol/l in group 2 and 23.3 +/- 3.9 mmol /l (p < 0.001) in group 3. While a lack of increase in serum bicarbonate an d arterial pH was correlated to poor prognosis in lactate- and bicarbonate- based hemofiltration, no such observation was made in acetate-based hemofil tration. Cardiovascular hemodynamics were superior in patients treated with lactate- and bicarbonate-based buffer solution as compared to those treate d with acetate-based buffer solution. Conclusions: The degree of correction of acidosis during hemofiltration was determined by patient outcome in patients treated with lactate- and bicarb onate-based buffer solutions, but not in patients receiving acetate-buffere d solution. Bicarbonate and lactate-based buffer solutions were found to be superior to acetate-based replacement fluid.