From the authors' perspective, Renzulli's definition, whether misinterprete
d to require a composite of traits-more interesting than the interpretation
Renzulli iterates-or used as Renzulli intended, to justify more inclusive
programs, relies on a dubious rationale for gifted education: to select and
nurture society's finest problem solvers. His emphasis on enrichment milit
ates against systematic accelerated study in academics and the arts. Taken
together, Renzulli's definition and intervention constitute a politically c
onservative, product-oriented approach to education that is more Likely to
reinforce social inequities of the current political economy than to equali
ze educational opportunity.