Molecular self association in water through hydrogen bonding is a powerful
organizational force leading to a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network
(water structure) that profoundly influences solvent properties. Localized
perturbations in the chemical potential of water as by, for example, conta
cting with a solid surface, induces compensating changes in water structure
that can be sensed tens of nanometers from the point of origin using the s
urface force apparatus (SFA) and ancillary techniques. These instruments re
veal attractive or repulsive forces between opposing surfaces immersed in w
ater, over-and-above that anticipated by continuum theory (DLVO), that are
attributed to a variable density (partial molar volume) of a more-or-less o
rdered water structure, depending on the water wettability (surface energy)
of the water-contacting surfaces. Water structure at surfaces is thus foun
d to be a manifestation of hydrophobicity and, while mechanistic/theoretica
l interpretation of experimental results remains the subject of some debate
in the literature, convergence of experimental observations permit a quant
itative definition of the heretofore relative terms 'hydrophobic' and 'hydr
ophilic'. In particular, long-range attractive forces (< 100 nm) are detect
ed only between surfaces exhibiting a water contact angle theta > 65 deg (d
efined as hydrophobic surfaces with pure water adhesion tension tau(0) = ga
mma(0)cos theta < 30 dyn cm(-1) where gamma(0) is water interfacial tension
= 72.8 dyn cm(-1)). Short range repulsive forces (< 5 nm) are detected bet
ween surfaces exhibiting theta < 65 deg (hydrophilic surfaces, tau(0) > 30
dyn cm(-1)). These findings together with other lines of chemical evidence
suggest at least two distinct kinds of water structure and reactivity: a re
latively less-dense water region against hydrophobic surfaces with an open
hydrogen-bonded network and a relatively more-dense water region against hy
drophilic surfaces with a collapsed hydrogen-bonded network.
Solvent properties of interfacial water profoundly influence the biological
response to materials in a surprisingly straightforward manner when key me
asures of biological activity sensitive to interfacial phenomenon are scale
d against water adhesion tension tau(0) of contacting surfaces. Protein ads
orption, activation of blood coagulation, and bioadhesion are offered as ex
amples in point, illustrating that the hydrophobic/hydrophilic contrast in
the biological response to materials, often disputed in biomaterials scienc
e, is very clear when viewed from the perspective of water structure and re
activity at surfaces.