A group of 4-7-year-old war orphans were examined for the first time while
living in an institution (the Solomuna Orphanage) during a protracted war b
etween Eritrea and Ethiopia. At that time, they were compared to a group of
refugee children living in a nearby camp with one or both parents. The orp
hans exhibited significantly more behavioral symptoms than the refugee chil
dren, but performed the cognitive tests at a more advanced level. Five year
s later, the orphans were re-examined; and they were compared to unaccompan
ied 9-12-year-children living in one of two residential settings that diffe
red qualitatively in their social climate, principles of child care, and pa
tterns of staff-child interactions. Although the severity of their behavior
al symptoms had diminished? the orphans still exhibited many symptoms of em
otional distress. On the other hand, they performed the cognitive measures
as well as, or better than, unaccompanied children who had been protected f
rom the terrors of war. The cross-sectional comparisons indicated that a re
sidential setting that respects the individuality of children and promotes
their close personal ties with at least one staff member can ameliorate man
y of the more serious psychological sequelae of having lost both parents an
d being exposed to the physical dangers of the war. The implications for wa
r orphans in other Third World countries are discussed.