A new level of sophistication is advocated for psychotherapy research-metho
dological pluralism. This pluralism recognizes the number of unexamined and
untested assumptions that are embedded within any method, including tradit
ional scientific methods. These assumptions restrict the questions that can
be asked and the Variables that can be tested before any investigation of
psychotherapy has occurred. Such premature closure is ultimately unscientif
ic and hinders truly creative investigations of psychotherapy. Consequently
, a framework is described that allows multiple methods-with multiple under
lying philosophies-to complement one another in psychotherapy research. Fiv
e essential benefits of this pluralistic framework are shown: advancement o
f science, increased objectivity, a lever playing field, greater scientific
freedom, and an end to the burgeoning "method wars" of psychotherapy resea
rch. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.