One of the most serious practical limitations of boundary element methods f
or gravity field determination is that they cannot make efficient use of ex
isting satellite geopotential models. Three basic approaches to solving the
problem are developed: (1) alternative representation formulas; (2) modifi
ed kernel functions of classical representation formulas; and (3) modified
trial and test spaces. The three methods are tested and compared for the al
timetry-gravimetry II boundary value problem. It is shown that there is in
fact a significant improvement when compared to the pure boundary element s
olution. Most promising is the method of multiscale trial and test spaces w
hich, in addition, yields sparse system matrices.