Using data on Asian equity markets, we observe that during periods of finan
cial turmoil, deviations from the mean-variance framework become more sever
e, resulting in periods with additional downside risk to investors. Current
risk management techniques failing to take this additional downside risk i
nto account will underestimate the true Value-at-Risk with greater severity
during periods of financial turnoil. We provide a conditional approach to
the Value-at-Risk methodology, known as conditional VaR-x, which to capture
the time variation of non-normalities allows for additional tail fatness i
n the distribution of expected returns. These conditional VaR-x estimates a
re then compared to those based on the RiskMetrics(TM) methodology from J.P
. Morgan, where we fmd that the model provides improved forecasts of the Va
lue-at-Risk. We are therefore able to show that our conditional VaR-x estim
ates are better able to capture the nature of downside risk, particularly c
rucial in times of financial crises. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rig
hts reserved.