Neisseria meningitidis is an important pathogen because it causes life-thre
atening infections, The rapid course of meningococcal disease and the capac
ity of some serogroups to cause large-scale epidemics necessitates the use
of sensitive, reliable and rapid typing methods to characterise strains. Mo
lecular typing techniques for N. meningitidis are used for epidemiological
purposes to investigate outbreaks and the spread of organisms and to examin
e the population genetic structure of the organism to understand better its
variation and evolution. Many investigators have employed molecular typing
methods and shown that meningococcal disease is associated,vith a variety
of different epidemiological patterns. The choice of a typing method is dep
endent upon the epidemiological questions to be answered and on the populat
ion genetics of the organism under investigation. With highly clonal popula
tions comprising independent non-recombining lineages such as serogroup A m
eningococci, ribotyping, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), pulsed-f
ield gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), PCR wit
h arbitrary primers (RAPD) or with other gene-based primers each provides a
constant measure of the relationship between strains. A more restricted po
rtfolio of molecular methods - PFGE, MLEE and MLST - is appropriate for the
investigation of less clonal serogroup B and C meningococci from localised
outbreaks, If a thorough evaluation of the overall population is sought to
determine the relationship between new isolates and members of hyper-endem
ic clonal complexes then quantitative methods such as MLEE and MLST are nec
essary. Several PCR-based methods are used for the detection and typing of
meningococcal strains, many requiring rigorous standardisation before they
can be considered suitable for rapid and reliable differentiation between c
lones. This review examines strain characterisation by molecular techniques
and non-culture-based subtyping of meningococci in clinical specimens, It
assesses the importance of these techniques and examines the epidemiologica
l questions that they answer and also their limitations.