Irradiation of DNA with ultraviolet light generates a variety of photolesio
ns. Among them, are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and (6-4) photoprod
ucts blocking lesions that interfere with DNA replication if left unrepaire
d. In addition to efficient pre-replicative excision repair mechanisms, cel
ls have evolved damage tolerance pathways enabling them to replicate lesion
-containing DNA molecules either by directly replicating through the damage
d base (translesion synthesis, TLS) or by employing the locally undamaged c
omplementary strand thus avoiding the lesion (damage avoidance pathways, DA
). Using double-stranded vectors with a single T(6-4)T UV lesion and a stra
nd segregation analysis (SSA), we have measured the relative utilization of
the two tolerance pathways (TLS and DA) in Escherichia coli. During the SO
S response the error-prone TLS pathway is strongly stimulated (approximate
to 20-fold) at the expense of the error-free DA pathways. Thus, up-regulati
on of TLS may turn out to be a general property of the SOS response; a simi
lar conclusion was previously reached with the frameshift-inducing N-2-acet
ylaminofluorene adduct. Therefore, as far as its contribution to damaged DN
A replication is concerned, the SOS response appears to be an induced mutat
or state rather than a survival strategy. Depending on the base inserted op
posite the lesion, TLS can be error-free or mutagenic. In a wild-type strai
n, both forms of TLS are increased to a similar extent during the SOS respo
nse. In contrast, in a Delta umuDC strain induction of TLS is totally aboli
shed, demonstrating that the UmuDC proteins usually thought to be specifica
lly involved in mutagenesis facilitate the recovery of both error-free and
mutagenic replication intermediates in vivo. (C) 1999 Academic Press.