Allport (1954) recognized that attachment to one's ingroups does not necess
arily require hostility toward outgroups. Yet the prevailing approach to th
e study of ethnocentrism, ingroup bias, and prejudice presumes that ingroup
love and outgroup hate are reciprocally related. Findings from both cross-
cultural research and laboratory experiments support the alternative view t
hat ingroup identification is independent of negative attitudes toward outg
oups and that much ingroup bias and intergroup discrimination is motivated
by preferential treatment of ingroup members rather than direct hostility t
oward outgroup members. Thus to understand the roots of prejudice and discr
imination requires first of all a better understanding of the functions tha
t ingroup formation and identification serve for human beings. This article
reviews research anal theory on the motivations for maintenance of ingroup
boundaries and the implications of ingroup boundary protection for intergr
oup relations, conflict, and conflict prevention.