OBJECTIVES: Urinary catheters are used frequently, but the relative risks a
nd benefits of different types of devices are not clear. We sought to deter
mine the beliefs of both older male patients and nursing staff about the re
lative merits and problems of condom and indwelling catheters.
DESIGN: Patient and nurse survey using convenience sampling.
SETTING: A University-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center.
PARTICIPANTS: Men hospitalized on medical, rehabilitation and nursing home
units using either an indwelling ora condom catheter were invited to partic
ipate as were all members of the nursing staff on these units. Of 116 eligi
ble patients, 104 were interviewed (response rate = 90%). Of 107 eligible n
ursing staff members, 99 completed the questionnaires (response rate = 92%)
.
INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: Consenting patients were interviewed persona
lly about their urinary catheter. The nursing staff were asked to complete
a self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients were mostly older and predominantly hospitalized on the m
edical service. Compared with those using an indwelling catheter, patients
using a condom catheter were more likely to believe that their catheter was
comfortable (86 vs 58%, P = .04) and less likely to believe it was painful
(14 vs 48%, P = .008) or to restrict their activity (24 vs 61%, P = .002).
The nursing staff had a mean of 13 years nursing experience, and the major
ity worked in the nursing home unit. Most of the nursing staff respondents
believed that condom catheters were less painful and restrictive for patien
ts and were easier to apply, but they also believed that they fell off and
leaked more often and required more nursing time.
CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and nursing staff prefer condom to indwelling ca
theters for patient comfort, but they recognize that dislodgment and leakin
g are major drawbacks of condom catheters. A more secure condom catheter wo
uld greatly improve the management of male incontinence.