The over-representation of British and the under-representation of Fre
nch and ''other'' ethnic groups amongst the Canadian elites has been a
part of the Canadian academic consciousness since the publication of
Porter's Vertical Mosaic (1965), Clement's Canadian Corporate Elite (1
975) and Olsen's State Elite (1980). Recently, a series of articles by
Ogmundson and Ogmundson/McLaughlin has raised doubts about the vertic
al ethnic distribution of power among elites, suggesting that conventi
onal wisdom should be abandoned. This paper uses the data provided by
Ogmundson and McLaughlin (1992), standardizes them to the ethnic compo
sition of the Canadian population, and shows that the new imagery prov
ided by these authors is misleading. The analysis demonstrates a stabl
e pattern of British dominance from 1935 to 1987 for each category of
elites. It also reveals that, consistent with Porter, Clement and Olse
n, the French and ''other'' ethnic groups have improved their particip
ation at the elite levels but remain underrepresented in relation to t
heir populations.