Background. Hypertension accelerates renal failure in autosomal dominant po
lycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), and evidence suggests a role for the renin
-angiotensin system (RAS) in the functional and structural changes. To expl
ore the hypothesis that RAS adaptations contribute to disease progression,
we examined RAS activity and the long-term consequences of antihypertensive
drugs, which suppress (enalapril) or stimulate (hydralazine) the RAS, in e
xperimental polycystic kidney disease.
Methods. Studies were conducted in male heterozygous cystic Han:SPRD rats (
Cy/+) and in unaffected littermates (controls). In protocol 1, either angio
tensin II (Ang II), enalaprilat, or saline vehicle was acutely infused into
cystic and control rats, which were aged 10 to 12 weeks. The mean arterial
pressure (MAP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal plasma flow (R
PF) were measured at baseline and after an infusion of test substances. In
protocol 2, cystic rats received chronic therapy with either enalapril, hyd
ralazine, or no therapy for 10 to 12 weeks of age and then underwent renal
function and RAS studies. In protocol 3, similar cohorts were followed for
40 weeks to assess the effects of therapy on blood pressure, proteinuria, s
erum creatinine, RAS parameters, and renal morphology.
Results. In protocol 1, cystic rats had massive kidneys, slightly elevated
blood pressure, and profound renal vasoconstriction and reduced GFR. Ang II
induced similar changes in MAP and renal function in control and cystic ra
ts. Enalaprilat induced little effect on MAP but more striking increases in
GFR and RPF in cystic rats. In protocol 2, at 10 weeks of age, enalapril w
as superior in preserving renal function, but neither drug limited the expa
nsion of the tubulointerstitium. In protocol 3, at 40 weeks of age, both dr
ugs ameliorated the increase in serum creatinine, although only enalapril r
educed proteinuria and kidney size.
Conclusions. In polycystic rats, acute RAS suppression markedly ameliorates
renal dysfunction. However, although chronic enalapril and hydralazine pro
tect against the loss of renal function, only enalapril limits renal growth
and proteinuria, and neither significantly limits tubulointerstitial fibro
sis. The long-term studies give clear support to the importance of blood pr
essure control, per se, but only partial support to the importance of the p
articular agent used. As in clinical studies, angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibition may be less beneficial in ADPKD than in renal diseases characte
rized by predominant glomerular injury.