Ra. Harris et Rf. Nease, THE IMPORTANCE OF PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR COMORBIDITIES IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES, Journal of health economics, 16(1), 1997, pp. 113-119
When using cost-effectiveness analyses to prioritize the allocation of
health care resources across patients, a standard definition of effec
tiveness must be used. In an informal review of cost-effectiveness ana
lyses, we found a heterogeneity in the methods used to qualify adjust
years of life. Many studies do not account for the morbid conditions t
hat patients experience other than the index condition being studied.
These studies systematically overstate health benefit relative to stud
ies that do for comorbidities. We recommend that patient preferences f
or comorbid conditions be incorporated into analyses to allow a consis
tent and facile comparison of cost-utility ratios for societal decisio
n making.