The aim of this study was to identify and critically review evaluations of
the effectiveness of health promotion programmes in the workplace, In line
with guidelines for 'good practice' within the literature on workplace heal
th promotion, this study aimed to assess the extent to which evaluated inte
rventions considered employees' expressed needs or involved employee-employ
er partnerships, Overall, 110 outcome evaluations were located. Only a quar
ter of these reported that interventions were implemented in response to th
e explicit needs and/or views of the employees and very few involved partne
rships. Most of the programmes targeted individual behaviour and supportive
organizational change was limited. The majority of the outcome evaluations
were not sufficiently rigorous to make a strong case for the effectiveness
of workplace health promotion. However, some pointers to success were iden
tified. It was concluded that there seems to be a wide disparity between wh
at counts as 'good practice' within workplace health promotion and what is
reported in the evaluation of effectiveness literature. This is not to say
that 'good practice' does not exist, but that either such programmes are no
t rigorously evaluated for their effectiveness and/or that many of the eval
uation findings remain outside the public domain.