P. Koteja et al., Energy cost of wheel running in house mice: Implications for coadaptation of locomotion and energy budgets, PHYSIOL B Z, 72(2), 1999, pp. 238-249
Laboratory house mice (Mus domesticus) that had experienced 10 generations
of artificial selection for high levels of voluntary wheel running ran abou
t 70% more total revolutions per day than did mice from random-bred control
lines. The difference resulted primarily from increased average velocities
rather than from increased time spent running. Within all eight lines (fou
r selected, four control), females ran more than males. Average daily runni
ng distances ranged from 4,4 km in control males to 11.6 km in selected fem
ales, Whole-animal food consumption was statistically indistinguishable in
the selected and control lines. However, mice from selected lines averaged
approximately 10% smaller in body mass, and mass-adjusted food consumption
was 4% higher in selected lines than in controls. The incremental cost of l
ocomotion (grams food/revolution), computed as the partial regression slope
of food consumption on revolutions run per day, did not differ between sel
ected and control mice. On a 24-h basis, the total incremental cost of runn
ing (covering a distance) amounted to only 4.4% of food consumption in the
control lines and 7.5% in the selected ones. However, the daily incremental
cost of time active is higher (15.4% and 13.1% of total food consumption i
n selected and control lines, respectively). If wheel running in the select
ed lines continues to increase mainly by increases in velocity, then constr
aints related to energy acquisition are unlikely to be an important factor
limiting further selective gain. Mon generally, our results suggest that, i
n small mammals, a substantial evolutionary increase in daily movement dist
ances can be achieved by increasing running speed, without remarkable incre
ases in total energy expenditure.