Tg. Reilly et al., COMPARISON OF SERUM, SALIVARY, AND RAPID WHOLE-BLOOD DIAGNOSTIC-TESTSFOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI AND THEIR VALIDATION AGAINST ENDOSCOPY BASED TESTS, Gut, 40(4), 1997, pp. 454-458
Background-A rapid, reliable, and accurate test for the diagnosis of i
nfection with Helicobacter pylori is needed for screening dyspeptic pa
tients before referral for endoscopy. Aim-To compare a new rapid whole
blood test (Helisal rapid blood, Cortecs), two serum enzyme linked im
munosorbent assays (ELISAs; Helico-G, Shield and Helisal serum, Cortec
s), and a salivary assay (Helisal saliva, Cortecs), with slide biopsy
urease, C-13-urea breath test, and histology. Methods-Three hundred an
d three consecutive dyspeptic patients attending for gastroscopy under
went two antral biopsies for histology, and one for rapid slide biopsy
urease test for assessment of H pylori status. Blood and saliva were
also collected. One hundred of the patients also underwent a C-13-urea
breath test. Gold standard positives were defined as those with at le
ast two positive tests among slide urease, breath test, or histology,
and gold standard negatives as those with all these (or two when the b
reath test was not done) negative. Results-Of 300 patients (median age
63, range 28-89) eligible for analysis, 137 (46%) were gold standard
positives, of which Helisal rapid blood identified 116, Helico-G 129,
Helisal serum 130, and Helisal saliva 120; 137 (46%) were gold standar
d negatives of which the number falsely identified as positive was 30
by Helisal rapid blood, 45 by Helico-G, 41 by Helisal serum, and 41 by
Helisal saliva. Sensitivities and specificities were: for the whole b
lood test 85% and 78% respectively; for Helico-G 94% and 67%, for Heli
sal serum 95% and 70%, and for Helisal saliva 84% and 70%. Conclusions
-If endoscopy had been undertaken only on patients with positive tests
two of 16 duodenal ulcers would have been missed if the Helisal rapid
blood test was used, and one if any of the ELISA tests were used. Non
e of the blood tests would have missed any of six gastric ulcers, but
the salivary test would have missed one.