TREATMENT IN GERM-CELL TUMORS - STATE-OF-THE-ART

Citation
Vcg. Tjanheijnen et al., TREATMENT IN GERM-CELL TUMORS - STATE-OF-THE-ART, European journal of surgical oncology, 23(2), 1997, pp. 110-117
Citations number
77
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Oncology
ISSN journal
07487983
Volume
23
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
110 - 117
Database
ISI
SICI code
0748-7983(1997)23:2<110:TIGT-S>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Although the majority of patients with disseminated germ cell tumours can be cured with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, mortality is still up to 20%. Several prognostic factors have been identified to differentia te between patients with a good, intermediate or poor prognosis. In th is review we discuss the recent chemotherapy trials, which were design ed to reduce toxicity in good-prognosis patients and to improve effica cy in intermediate- and poor-prognosis patients. In good-prognosis pat ients it is obvious that the omission of bleomycin and the replacement of cisplatin by carboplatin has no place in first-line standard treat ment. The reduction of four standard courses of bleomycin, etoposide a nd cisplatin (BEP) to three is shown possible in one study, but a conf irmatory study is currently ongoing in the EORTC. In intermediate- and poor-prognosis patients, the use of new agents or alternating regimen s (with or without shortened intervals) did, by now, not improve final outcome. The role of high-dose chemotherapy remains to be determined. Against this background, four courses of standard-dose BEP should sti ll be considered treatment of first choice in the majority of patients with disseminated germ cell tumours. Furthermore, the policy in clini cal stage I disease has been reviewed. In clinical stage I seminoma pa tients the policy is to apply adjuvant radiotherapy, while the strateg y in patients with non-seminomatous tumours (surveillance, retroperito neal lymph node dissection or adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patie nts) depends highly on the local situation, such as the operating skil ls of the urologist, and on the possibilities for tight follow-up. Of patients with true resistance for up-front BEP chemotherapy 90% will n ormally die. In patients who achieve a complete response on first-line chemotherapy, but relapse thereafter 30% will have no evidence of dis ease with second-line chemotherapy (VIP). In this group of patients re sults with high-dose chemotherapy seem promising, but its value should preferentially be determined in either a randomized fashion or by lon g-term follow-up from a large group of patients according to a similar protocol. The use of post-chemotherapy surgery is an essential part o f management for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours, while the majority of residual masses in pure seminoma will disappear sponta neously, and frequent follow-up is recommended instead of surgical int ervention.