Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases

Citation
A. Donini et al., Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases, SURG ENDOSC, 13(12), 1999, pp. 1220-1225
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN journal
09302794 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1220 - 1225
Database
ISI
SICI code
0930-2794(199912)13:12<1220:LVOSIT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is becoming the gold standard in the treatment of several splenic diseases. Shorter postoperative stay and m ore rapid return to full activity are the primary advantages of LS. Methods: Prospective data collection of 44 consecutive LS (group 1) and com parison with a historical control group of 56 consecutive open splenectomie s (OS) (group 2) were performed for hematologic diseases. Results: The LS patients started earlier on an oral diet (p < 0.0001) and l eft the hospital sooner (p < 0.0002) than OS patients. Less blood transfusi on (p < 0.004) and pain medication (p < 0.0001) was required by LS patients . They also had fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.03). Compared by d iagnosis, patients with laparoscopic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or Hodgkin's disease started to eat earlier (p < 0.0001) and left the hospita l sooner (p < 0.01), Multivariate analysis showed that time to oral diet an d postoperative stay was related to operative technique and age. Morbidity and pain medications were related, respectively, to transfusion requirement s and type of surgical approach. Conclusions: Used to manage hematologic diseases, LS is feasible, effective , and safe. It offers several advantages over the open approach. The type o f surgical approach seems to be the crucial factor in determining the lengt h of the postoperative course.