B. Jamil et al., Impact of acute rejection therapy on infections and malignancies in renal transplant recipients, TRANSPLANT, 68(10), 1999, pp. 1597-1603
Background. Infections and malignancies are important causes of mortality a
nd morbidity in renal allograft recipients. Their risk increases with incre
asing immunosuppression.
Methods. In an attempt to quantitate the increase in the risk of these comp
lications in association with antirejection therapy, we reviewed the record
s of all renal allograft recipients of our center transplanted during the c
yclosporin era. We sub-divided the patients into three groups based on acut
e rejection episodes during the first 6 months posttransplant, and the trea
tment for acute rejection: those who did not develop AR-group 1 (n=168); th
ose who had one or more episodes of acute rejection and were treated with h
igh dose corticosteroids -group 2 (n=169); those who in addition to cortico
steroids required cytolytics (OKT3,) and/or other drugs-group 3 (n=141).
Results. 52% patients in group 1, 71% patients in group 2 and 86% patients
in group 3 had one or more episodes of infection during the first 6 months
posttransplantation. Relative risk for group 2 and 3 were 1.56 (P=0.0002) a
nd 2.98 (P<0.00001), respectively. Infection/patient rates at 6 months were
0.67, 1.23, and 2.79 in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Groups 1 and 2 ha
d a similar number of cases with squamous and basal cell carcinoma, however
, there were few cases with these malignancies in group 3. No case of lymph
oma was seen in group Ii there were four cases in group 2 and nine in group
3, There was no significant difference in patient survival in group 1 and
2, however, patients in group 3 had a reduced patient survival (1 vs. 3 P<0
.001, 2 vs. 3 P=0.067), Graft survival was best in group 1 and worst in gro
up 3 (1 vs. 2 P<0.05; 1 vs. 3 P<0.00001; 2 vs. 3 P<0.01),
Conclusions. In renal transplant recipients the risk of infections and lymp
homa increases with increasing immunosuppression and hence mortality and mo
rbidity associated with it. When adding a potent immunosuppressive agent to
rescue a kidney one needs to consider the serious and at times fatal side
effects given the modest beneficial effect on long-term outcome.