The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences
between two approaches to grounded theory research: grounded theory as esp
oused by Glaser and grounded theory as espoused by Strauss and Corbin. The
focus of the article is the controversy surrounding the use of axial coding
. The author proposes a resolution to the controversy by suggesting that on
e does not need to view either approach as right or wrong; rather the quali
tative and grounded theory researcher can choose on approach, and that choi
ce is based on the goal of the researcher's study. Examples of both approac
hes, from the author's research study on the experiences of living in a fam
ily with a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), are
provided.